SHIVAM KHARE & ORS. vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. — CRL.M.C./4004/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34. Status: Fresh Matters & Applications. Next hearing: 10th September 2026.

Fresh Matters & Applications Next hearing 10-Sep-2026 Today

CNR: DLHC010361782025

Filing Number

CRL.M.C./3761718/2025

Filing Date

27-May-2025

Registration No

CRL.M.C./4004/2025

Registration Date

29-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAM KHARE & ORS.

    Adv. TUSHAR MUDGIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Case History

  1. 10-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

    Case Summary: CRL.M.C. 4004/2025 The Delhi High Court adjourned the petition and related applications (for stay and amendment) to 10.09.2026. The Court noted that petitioner No. 3 (sister-in-law of complainant) has not been chargesheeted, and clarified that the pendency of this petition will not restrict the rights and remedies available to petitioners 1 and 2 before the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  7. 30-May-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Shalinder KaurView PDF

  8. 27-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.M.C./4004/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.M.C. 4004/2025 The Delhi High Court adjourned the petition and related applications (for stay and amendment) to 10.09.2026. The Court noted that petitioner No. 3 (sister-in-law of complainant) has not been chargesheeted, and clarified that the pendency of this petition will not restrict the rights and remedies available to petitioners 1 and 2 before the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case