SUKHBLR SINGH SHOKEEN vs ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT — CRL.M.C./4641/2024

Case under Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 Section 4. Disposed: -- on 26th May 2026.

CNR: DLHC010339542024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th October 2024

Filing Number

CRL.M.C./1712017/2024

Filing Date

28-05-2024

Registration No

CRL.M.C./4641/2024

Registration Date

29-05-2024

Judge

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

Coram

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

26th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

SUKHBLR SINGH SHOKEEN

Adv. SHADMAN AHMED SIDDIQUI

Respondent(s)

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

21-05-2026

AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS

21-04-2026

AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS

Orders

21-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI,HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

The Delhi High Court issued an interim order addressing a contempt matter regarding delayed information sharing. The DCP, Crime Branch, South-West District, Delhi, who had failed to provide information sought by the ED despite the court's earlier directive, appeared and expressed regret for the delay; the court discharged him after the information was subsequently provided. The matter was adjourned to 26.05.2026 pending ED's instructions, with the ED's special counsel seeking additional time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court issued an interim order addressing a contempt matter regarding delayed information sharing. The DCP, Crime Branch, South-West District, Delhi, who had failed to provide information sought by the ED despite the court's earlier directive, appeared and expressed regret for the delay; the court discharged him after the information was subsequently provided. The matter was adjourned to 26.05.2026 pending ED's instructions, with the ED's special counsel seeking additional time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case