UETA INC & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Advocate - KHAITAN & CO. — W.P.(C)/8049/2024
Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
CNR: DLHC010336202024
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/1668316/2024
Filing Date
27-May-2024
Registration No
W.P.(C)/8049/2024
Registration Date
28-May-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Last updated 30-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UETA INC & ORS.
Adv. KARMA DORJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Advocate - KHAITAN & CO.
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit MahajanView PDF
-
25-May-2026
For Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
-
18-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit MahajanView PDF
-
18-May-2026
For Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
-
15-Apr-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish BhatnagarView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish BhatnagarView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
17-Dec-2025
Summary: UETA INC & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (W.P.(C) 8049/2024) Outcome: Writ petition dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction. Delhi High Court found no material part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction, despite exclusive jurisdiction clause in RFP favoring Delhi courts. Key Facts: UETA INC and partners challenged rejection of their bid for duty-free outlets at Noida International Airport, alleging the tender process was illegal and mala fide. Winner (Heinemann Asia Pacific and BWC Forwarders) was awarded the license via Letter of Intent on 3 May 2024. Reasoning: Court held that mere payment of bid fees into Delhi bank account, website announcement in Delhi, or executives signing from Delhi office do not constitute integral parts of cause of action under Article 226(2). Substantive procurement activities occurred in Uttar Pradesh; contractual jurisdiction clauses cannot create jurisdiction where none exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela,hon'ble Chief JusticeView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela,hon'ble Chief JusticeView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela,hon'ble Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
13-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva,hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao GedelaView PDF
-
28-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva,hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao GedelaView PDF
-
21-Apr-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
15-Apr-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
01-Apr-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
04-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva,hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao GedelaView PDF
-
10-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva,hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao GedelaView PDF
-
21-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu BakhruView PDF
-
17-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru
-
13-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv ShakdherView PDF
-
02-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
28-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
28-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
31-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
30-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
29-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
27-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/8049/2024
Summary: UETA INC & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (W.P.(C) 8049/2024) Outcome: Writ petition dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction. Delhi High Court found no material part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction, despite exclusive jurisdiction clause in RFP favoring Delhi courts. Key Facts: UETA INC and partners challenged rejection of their bid for duty-free outlets at Noida International Airport, alleging the tender process was illegal and mala fide. Winner (Heinemann Asia Pacific and BWC Forwarders) was awarded the license via Letter of Intent on 3 May 2024. Reasoning: Court held that mere payment of bid fees into Delhi bank account, website announcement in Delhi, or executives signing from Delhi office do not constitute integral parts of cause of action under Article 226(2). Substantive procurement activities occurred in Uttar Pradesh; contractual jurisdiction clauses cannot create jurisdiction where none exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts