SUNITA ROHELA & ANR KATHPALIA ASSOCIATES vs STATE & ANR — CRL.M.C./3990/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34. Disposed: -- on 19th November 2019.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Aug-2019

CNR: DLHC010333552019

Filing Number

CRL.M.C./766042/2019

Filing Date

13-Aug-2019

Registration No

CRL.M.C./3990/2019

Registration Date

13-Aug-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar

Category

OTHER CRIMINAL MISC. PETITIONS ( 10197 )

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

19-Nov-2019

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA ROHELA & ANR KATHPALIA ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE & ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh BanerjeeView PDF

  3. 16-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  7. 19-Nov-2019

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRL.M.C. 3990/2019 The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners Sunita Rohela and another to travel to the UK despite pending dowry and criminal breach of trust charges (IPC 498A/406/34), finding that senior citizens cannot be held as leverage to compel their son's appearance in court. The court imposed conditions requiring Rs. 5 lacs security each with sureties and mandatory submission of detailed travel plans to the trial court three days before departure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 13-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.M.C./3990/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.M.C. 3990/2019 The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners Sunita Rohela and another to travel to the UK despite pending dowry and criminal breach of trust charges (IPC 498A/406/34), finding that senior citizens cannot be held as leverage to compel their son's appearance in court. The court imposed conditions requiring Rs. 5 lacs security each with sureties and mandatory submission of detailed travel plans to the trial court three days before departure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case