USHA ANAND SUDARSHAN RAJAN vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — W.P.(C)/11139/2021
Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010306442021
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/796419/2021
Filing Date
28-Sep-2021
Registration No
W.P.(C)/11139/2021
Registration Date
29-Sep-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.hari Shankar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash Shukla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.hari Shankar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash Shukla
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.USHA ANAND SUDARSHAN RAJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
The Delhi High Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's August 2019 judgment as unreasoned because it failed to address the petitioner's substantive contentions in her two original applications challenging disciplinary punishment orders (grade pay reduction in 2013 and compulsory retirement in 2015). The court remanded both cases to the Tribunal for de novo reconsideration, with all factual and legal contentions remaining open for both parties to argue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish Dayal
-
25-Mar-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
17-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Kumar MendirattaView PDF
-
25-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Kumar JainView PDF
-
09-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh BanerjeeView PDF
-
28-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/11139/2021
-
15-Feb-2021
Fresh Matters & Applications
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar
The Delhi High Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's August 2019 judgment as unreasoned because it failed to address the petitioner's substantive contentions in her two original applications challenging disciplinary punishment orders (grade pay reduction in 2013 and compulsory retirement in 2015). The court remanded both cases to the Tribunal for de novo reconsideration, with all factual and legal contentions remaining open for both parties to argue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts