AJAY YADAV ARUN VOHRA vs GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI — W.P.(C)/9526/2023
Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010272632023
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/1200583/2023
Filing Date
17-Jul-2023
Registration No
W.P.(C)/9526/2023
Registration Date
18-Jul-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJAY YADAV ARUN VOHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar KauravView PDF
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ajay Yadav challenging a recovery notice and warrant of arrest issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi under the Punjab Revenue Act, 1887. The petition was dismissed because the petitioner had expired, making it impossible for counsel to take further instructions. The court allowed the petitioner's legal heirs to pursue appropriate legal remedies if they wished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar KauravView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar KauravView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar KauravView PDF
-
11-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela,hon'ble Chief JusticeView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sachin DattaView PDF
-
09-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev NarulaView PDF
-
29-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev NarulaView PDF
-
06-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF
-
29-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF
-
17-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/9526/2023
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ajay Yadav challenging a recovery notice and warrant of arrest issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi under the Punjab Revenue Act, 1887. The petition was dismissed because the petitioner had expired, making it impossible for counsel to take further instructions. The court allowed the petitioner's legal heirs to pursue appropriate legal remedies if they wished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts