VEENA KHANNA SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS SHASHANK MAHESH AGRAWAL vs SONIA VENUGOPAL & ANR. — RFA/545/2023

Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Jul-2023

CNR: DLHC010266062023

Filing Number

RFA/1041701/2023

Filing Date

06-Jul-2023

Registration No

RFA/545/2023

Registration Date

14-Jul-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VEENA KHANNA SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS SHASHANK MAHESH AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SONIA VENUGOPAL & ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    —View PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: RFA/545/2023 The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by Veena Khanna's legal heirs (Ashish Khanna and Ritika Punj) seeking condonation of a 6-year, 9-month delay in filing appeals against an ex-parte decree dated 30.07.2016. The decree had ordered specific performance of property sale agreements to transfer a 1/3 share in Delhi property to respondents Sonia and Saveena Venugopal. The court found no sufficient cause for the delay, noting the appellants had earlier withdrawn their Order IX Rule 13 CPC application in 2018 (stating willingness to execute the deed), and had been adequately represented by counsel throughout. The court rejected claims of advocate negligence and dismissed both RFA 488/2023 and RFA 545/2023 as unjustified afterthoughts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  4. 12-May-2026

    For Disposal

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

  5. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  7. 14-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaView PDF

  8. 26-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher,hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta GanjuView PDF

  9. 06-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF

  10. 01-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF

  11. 21-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF

  12. 06-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/545/2023

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: RFA/545/2023 The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by Veena Khanna's legal heirs (Ashish Khanna and Ritika Punj) seeking condonation of a 6-year, 9-month delay in filing appeals against an ex-parte decree dated 30.07.2016. The decree had ordered specific performance of property sale agreements to transfer a 1/3 share in Delhi property to respondents Sonia and Saveena Venugopal. The court found no sufficient cause for the delay, noting the appellants had earlier withdrawn their Order IX Rule 13 CPC application in 2018 (stating willingness to execute the deed), and had been adequately represented by counsel throughout. The court rejected claims of advocate negligence and dismissed both RFA 488/2023 and RFA 545/2023 as unjustified afterthoughts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case