SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY vs MS GEETI BHAGAT — CRL.M.C./4398/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: -- on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: DLHC010258282026

Filing Number

CRL.M.C./247063/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRL.M.C./4398/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY

    Adv. MUKUND SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MS GEETI BHAGAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit SharmaView PDF

    Summary of CRL.M.C. 4398/2026: The Delhi High Court disposed of Saurabh Kumar Pandey's petition seeking to compound cheque dishonor offenses under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by exempting him from physical appearance before the Appellate Court on 04.06.2026, allowing his final arguments on the appeal to proceed in his absence. The respondent did not object to this exemption, and the court granted the relief on a limited basis while directing the order be sent to the trial court for compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.M.C./4398/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRL.M.C. 4398/2026: The Delhi High Court disposed of Saurabh Kumar Pandey's petition seeking to compound cheque dishonor offenses under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by exempting him from physical appearance before the Appellate Court on 04.06.2026, allowing his final arguments on the appeal to proceed in his absence. The respondent did not object to this exemption, and the court granted the relief on a limited basis while directing the order be sent to the trial court for compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case