GAGANDEEP vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI — W.P.(CRL)/1770/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376. Disposed: -- on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: DLHC010257652026

Filing Number

W.P.(CRL)/237300/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

W.P.(CRL)/1770/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 376
Pocso Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAGANDEEP

    Adv. VRINDA BHANDARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh BanerjeeView PDF

    The Delhi High Court allowed Gagandeep's petition and set aside the Competent Authority's rejection of his parole request. The court granted two weeks of parole (rather than the three weeks sought) to enable him to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, holding that the right to pursue final legal remedies cannot be curtailed merely because of a POCSO Act conviction. The parole is conditional on furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bond, reporting weekly to police, maintaining contact availability, and avoiding contact with the victim/complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(CRL)/1770/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed Gagandeep's petition and set aside the Competent Authority's rejection of his parole request. The court granted two weeks of parole (rather than the three weeks sought) to enable him to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, holding that the right to pursue final legal remedies cannot be curtailed merely because of a POCSO Act conviction. The parole is conditional on furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bond, reporting weekly to police, maintaining contact availability, and avoiding contact with the victim/complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case