SANTOSHANAND AVADHUT @ GHANSHYAM PRASAD & ANR SIMA GULATI vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION — CRL.A./91/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CNR: DLHC010251402015
Filing Number
CRL.A./25140/2015
Filing Date
19-Jan-2015
Registration No
CRL.A./91/2015
Registration Date
20-Jan-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madhu Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madhu Jain
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSHANAND AVADHUT @ GHANSHYAM PRASAD & ANR SIMA GULATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Top Of The Board
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madhu Jain
-
24-Feb-2026
Case Summary: CRL.A. 91/2015 & CRL.A. 130/2015 Outcome: Case adjourned (part-heard). The Delhi High Court directed the CBI to file a status report by Joint Director rank taking a stand on whether it supports the conviction or re-investigation, with next hearing scheduled for March 25, 2026. No adjournments will be permitted thereafter. Key Facts: Two appellants (Anand Margi followers) were convicted in 2014 for the 1975 assassination of Railway Minister L.N. Mishra at Samastipur. The victim's family argues the investigation was deliberately diverted to wrongly implicate them, citing a 1978 government report suggesting other conspirators were exonerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj JainView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
27-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj JainView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad,hon'ble Chief JusticeView PDF
-
25-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. SinghView PDF
-
08-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. SinghView PDF
-
29-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. SinghView PDF
-
03-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. SinghView PDF
-
29-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. SinghView PDF
-
16-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar KaitView PDF
-
01-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj JainView PDF
-
27-Mar-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar KaitView PDF
-
01-Mar-2023
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
07-Apr-2015
Connected Matters (Anmm)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao
-
06-Apr-2015
Connected Matters (Anmm)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.p.garg
-
26-Mar-2015
After Notice Misc. Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kailash Gambhir , Hon'ble Mr. Justice I.s.mehta
-
17-Mar-2015
After Notice Misc. Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.s.sistani , Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
-
03-Mar-2015
After Notice Misc. Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.s.sistani , Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
-
23-Feb-2015
After Notice Misc. Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.s.sistani , Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
-
18-Feb-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2015
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.A./91/2015
Case Summary: CRL.A. 91/2015 & CRL.A. 130/2015 Outcome: Case adjourned (part-heard). The Delhi High Court directed the CBI to file a status report by Joint Director rank taking a stand on whether it supports the conviction or re-investigation, with next hearing scheduled for March 25, 2026. No adjournments will be permitted thereafter. Key Facts: Two appellants (Anand Margi followers) were convicted in 2014 for the 1975 assassination of Railway Minister L.N. Mishra at Samastipur. The victim's family argues the investigation was deliberately diverted to wrongly implicate them, citing a 1978 government report suggesting other conspirators were exonerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts