RAKESH KAPOOR SHASHANK MAHESH AGRAWAL vs SONIA VENUGOPAL & ANR. — RFA/488/2023

Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Jul-2023

CNR: DLHC010248462023

Filing Number

RFA/1041742/2023

Filing Date

01-Jun-2023

Registration No

RFA/488/2023

Registration Date

03-Jul-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KAPOOR SHASHANK MAHESH AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SONIA VENUGOPAL & ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    View PDF

    Case Summary: RFA 488/2023 & RFA 545/2023 Court Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed both condonation of delay applications and the underlying appeals (RFA 488/2023 and RFA 545/2023). Key Reasoning: The appellants sought to challenge an ex-parte judgment dated 30.07.2016 (ordering specific performance of property sale agreements) with a 6-year, 9-month delay, blaming advocate negligence. However, the court found the appellants themselves deliberately chose not to challenge the decree—they had previously filed and withdrawn an application to set aside the ex-parte order in 2017, and the appellant personally stated willingness to execute the sale deed in 2018. The court rejected claims that advocate Mr. Vivek Sharma was negligent, noting other counsel had already pursued appropriate remedies earlier. The judgment itself was valid and legally sound, not void as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  4. 12-May-2026

    For Disposal

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

  5. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF

  8. 01-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF

  9. 14-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaView PDF

  10. 26-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher,hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta GanjuView PDF

  11. 06-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF

  12. 01-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF

  13. 21-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF

  14. 01-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/488/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RFA 488/2023 & RFA 545/2023 Court Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed both condonation of delay applications and the underlying appeals (RFA 488/2023 and RFA 545/2023). Key Reasoning: The appellants sought to challenge an ex-parte judgment dated 30.07.2016 (ordering specific performance of property sale agreements) with a 6-year, 9-month delay, blaming advocate negligence. However, the court found the appellants themselves deliberately chose not to challenge the decree—they had previously filed and withdrawn an application to set aside the ex-parte order in 2017, and the appellant personally stated willingness to execute the sale deed in 2018. The court rejected claims that advocate Mr. Vivek Sharma was negligent, noting other counsel had already pursued appropriate remedies earlier. The judgment itself was valid and legally sound, not void as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case