RAKESH KAPOOR SHASHANK MAHESH AGRAWAL vs SONIA VENUGOPAL & ANR. — RFA/488/2023
Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010248462023
Filing Number
RFA/1041742/2023
Filing Date
01-Jun-2023
Registration No
RFA/488/2023
Registration Date
03-Jul-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKESH KAPOOR SHASHANK MAHESH AGRAWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SONIA VENUGOPAL & ANR.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Case Summary: RFA 488/2023 & RFA 545/2023 Court Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed both condonation of delay applications and the underlying appeals (RFA 488/2023 and RFA 545/2023). Key Reasoning: The appellants sought to challenge an ex-parte judgment dated 30.07.2016 (ordering specific performance of property sale agreements) with a 6-year, 9-month delay, blaming advocate negligence. However, the court found the appellants themselves deliberately chose not to challenge the decree—they had previously filed and withdrawn an application to set aside the ex-parte order in 2017, and the appellant personally stated willingness to execute the sale deed in 2018. The court rejected claims that advocate Mr. Vivek Sharma was negligent, noting other counsel had already pursued appropriate remedies earlier. The judgment itself was valid and legally sound, not void as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
12-May-2026
For Disposal
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
-
11-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF
-
01-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF
-
14-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaView PDF
-
26-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher,hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta GanjuView PDF
-
06-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF
-
01-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF
-
21-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF
-
01-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. RFA/488/2023
Case Summary: RFA 488/2023 & RFA 545/2023 Court Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed both condonation of delay applications and the underlying appeals (RFA 488/2023 and RFA 545/2023). Key Reasoning: The appellants sought to challenge an ex-parte judgment dated 30.07.2016 (ordering specific performance of property sale agreements) with a 6-year, 9-month delay, blaming advocate negligence. However, the court found the appellants themselves deliberately chose not to challenge the decree—they had previously filed and withdrawn an application to set aside the ex-parte order in 2017, and the appellant personally stated willingness to execute the sale deed in 2018. The court rejected claims that advocate Mr. Vivek Sharma was negligent, noting other counsel had already pursued appropriate remedies earlier. The judgment itself was valid and legally sound, not void as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts