RAMAN GANDHI THROUGH COURT vs BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND ORS — W.P.(C)/7531/2026
Next hearing: 31st May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010242822026
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/235186/2026
Filing Date
23-May-2026
Registration No
W.P.(C)/7531/2026
Registration Date
24-May-2026
Judge
Cases Pertaining To Spl.division Benches
Coram
Cases Pertaining To Spl.division Benches
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMAN GANDHI THROUGH COURT
Respondent(s)
-
1.BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND ORS
Case History
-
31-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
31-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
Summary of W.P.(C) 7531/2026 – Raman Gandhi v. Bar Council of Delhi The case was adjourned pending production of evidence. The court directed the Investigating Officer to appear in-person on 01.06.2026 with the original DVR containing 23 camera recordings from the ballot counting process, deeming its perusal necessary for adjudication of the electoral dispute involving 221 candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
30-May-2026
Fresh Matters & Applications
Cases Pertaining To Spl.division Benches
-
29-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
29-May-2026
Fresh Matters & Applications
Cases Pertaining To Spl.division Benches
-
26-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish Dayal
-
23-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/7531/2026
Summary of W.P.(C) 7531/2026 – Raman Gandhi v. Bar Council of Delhi The case was adjourned pending production of evidence. The court directed the Investigating Officer to appear in-person on 01.06.2026 with the original DVR containing 23 camera recordings from the ballot counting process, deeming its perusal necessary for adjudication of the electoral dispute involving 221 candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts