RISHI PAL SINGH & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR. — W.P.(C)/7124/2026

Disposed: -- on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-May-2026

CNR: DLHC010233622026

Filing Number

W.P.(C)/212061/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

W.P.(C)/7124/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RISHI PAL SINGH & ORS.

    Adv. MD NAUSHAD ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit MahajanView PDF

    Case Summary: W.P.(C) 7124/2026 Rishi Pal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. Retired government employees (enrolled 1980-1984) sought mandamus to compel the Union to grant financial upgradations under the Assured Career Progression Scheme (1999) and Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (2009). The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition without adjudicating merits, directing Respondent No. 2 to decide the employees' representation (filed 31.03.2026) within one month, while preserving the respondent's right to pass appropriate orders per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C)/7124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: W.P.(C) 7124/2026 Rishi Pal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. Retired government employees (enrolled 1980-1984) sought mandamus to compel the Union to grant financial upgradations under the Assured Career Progression Scheme (1999) and Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (2009). The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition without adjudicating merits, directing Respondent No. 2 to decide the employees' representation (filed 31.03.2026) within one month, while preserving the respondent's right to pass appropriate orders per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case