KIRTI SHARMA & ORS. vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. — CRL.M.C./4046/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354B. Disposed: -- on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-May-2026

CNR: DLHC010231952026

Filing Number

CRL.M.C./209006/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRL.M.C./4046/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRTI SHARMA & ORS.

    Adv. YATHARTH SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri,hon'ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta SharmaView PDF

    The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 334/2018 registered against Kirti Sharma and others for offences under IPC Sections 323/341/354/354B/34, finding that the parties—neighbors involved in a June 2018 altercation—had amicably settled their dispute through a Memorandum of Understanding dated May 8, 2026, with respondents confirming they entered the compromise freely without coercion. The court held that continuing proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would create further acrimony, making quashing the FIR and all consequential proceedings in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.M.C./4046/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 334/2018 registered against Kirti Sharma and others for offences under IPC Sections 323/341/354/354B/34, finding that the parties—neighbors involved in a June 2018 altercation—had amicably settled their dispute through a Memorandum of Understanding dated May 8, 2026, with respondents confirming they entered the compromise freely without coercion. The court held that continuing proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would create further acrimony, making quashing the FIR and all consequential proceedings in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case