SGIVS GLOBAL LLC vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. — W.P.(C)/5286/2026
Disposed: -- on 13th May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010164552026
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/173844/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
W.P.(C)/5286/2026
Registration Date
18-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 28-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SGIVS GLOBAL LLC
Adv. RAJ SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
SUMMARY Delhi High Court dismissed SGIVS Global LLC's petition challenging a tender award for Consular-Passport-Visa services to Respondent No. 3, who quoted AED 19 per application (L-1 bidder) versus the petitioner's AED 52 bid (L-2 bidder). The court held that the RFP explicitly provided for L-1 selection based solely on lowest price without viability scrutiny, and courts cannot read additional requirements into tender conditions or rewrite them post-bid, particularly absent mala fides or arbitrariness. The lower discovered price also serves public interest by reducing costs for Indian diaspora applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit MahajanView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters & Applications
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
-
21-Apr-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/5286/2026
SUMMARY Delhi High Court dismissed SGIVS Global LLC's petition challenging a tender award for Consular-Passport-Visa services to Respondent No. 3, who quoted AED 19 per application (L-1 bidder) versus the petitioner's AED 52 bid (L-2 bidder). The court held that the RFP explicitly provided for L-1 selection based solely on lowest price without viability scrutiny, and courts cannot read additional requirements into tender conditions or rewrite them post-bid, particularly absent mala fides or arbitrariness. The lower discovered price also serves public interest by reducing costs for Indian diaspora applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts