RUBY ADIT SUBRAMANIAM PUJARI vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. — CRL.A./112/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: DLHC010030652026

Filing Number

CRL.A./45909/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRL.A./112/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUBY ADIT SUBRAMANIAM PUJARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh BanerjeeView PDF

    Summary: The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant Ruby's application for suspension of her 20-year sentence (imposed on 07.03.2025 for offences under Sections 376D/323/342/365/506/34 IPC) pending disposal of her criminal appeal. The court granted suspension on grounds of parity, as co-convict Ms. Neha received similar relief and the main convicts' sentences were already suspended. The appellant was released from judicial custody subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of equal amount, and conditions including not leaving the country without court permission and appearing before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh BanerjeeView PDF

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.A./112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant Ruby's application for suspension of her 20-year sentence (imposed on 07.03.2025 for offences under Sections 376D/323/342/365/506/34 IPC) pending disposal of her criminal appeal. The court granted suspension on grounds of parity, as co-convict Ms. Neha received similar relief and the main convicts' sentences were already suspended. The appellant was released from judicial custody subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of equal amount, and conditions including not leaving the country without court permission and appearing before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case