BUNTY HARPAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/69/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010548222025

Filing Number

CRA/21270/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRA/69/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT, KIDNAPPING & ABDUCTION. ( 1404 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUNTY HARPAL

    Adv. KABEER KALWANI,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL, ,SHIVANGI AGRAWAL,ANUSHKA SHARMA,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,MAYANK GUPTA,Rishabh Gupta,Arpan Verma,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,SHASHWAT MISHRA,SANDEEP PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2026 filed by Bunty Harpal against the State of Chhattisgarh. The Court directed the State to file its reply and objection to the interim application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail within two weeks, and to inform the Court of the appellant's criminal antecedents. The State counsel was also directed to notify the victim's father (PW-2) about the appeal's pendency so he may appear and object to the bail application. The matter was listed for further consideration on the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2026 filed by Bunty Harpal against the State of Chhattisgarh. The Court directed the State to file its reply and objection to the interim application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail within two weeks, and to inform the Court of the appellant's criminal antecedents. The State counsel was also directed to notify the victim's father (PW-2) about the appeal's pendency so he may appear and object to the bail application. The matter was listed for further consideration on the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case