DHANENDRA KUMAR CHELAK vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/391/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010546432025

Filing Number

MCRC/21208/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

MCRC/391/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANENDRA KUMAR CHELAK

    Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    MCRC/391/2026 Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Dhanendra Kumar Chelak, arrested for rash/negligent driving resulting in one death and one injury (Sections 105, 110 BNS; Sections 184, 177 Motor Vehicles Act). The court considered his lack of criminal antecedents, prolonged custody (since September 2025), early trial stage (only 4 of 25 witnesses examined), and lengthy trial duration ahead. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance including mandatory personal court appearances, no adjournment-seeking during evidence, and potential prosecution for bail violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

MCRC/391/2026 Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Dhanendra Kumar Chelak, arrested for rash/negligent driving resulting in one death and one injury (Sections 105, 110 BNS; Sections 184, 177 Motor Vehicles Act). The court considered his lack of criminal antecedents, prolonged custody (since September 2025), early trial stage (only 4 of 25 witnesses examined), and lengthy trial duration ahead. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance including mandatory personal court appearances, no adjournment-seeking during evidence, and potential prosecution for bail violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case