VIKASH MINA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/14/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010546022025

Filing Number

CRA/21191/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRA/14/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS RELATING TO DRUGS & COSMETICS, NDPS ACT. ( 1416 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKASH MINA

    Adv. KIRAN JAIN,R. K. Jain,R. K. Jain, R. K. Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted three consolidated criminal appeals (CRA Nos. 14, 285, and 474/2026) filed by Vikash Mina against the State of Chhattisgarh. The court condoned the delay in filing CRA No. 474/2026 as the State had no objection and the cause shown was satisfactory. The State has been directed to file its objections regarding suspension of sentence and bail applications within two weeks and provide details of the appellants' criminal antecedents. The matter is listed for further hearing on the bail and suspension applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted three consolidated criminal appeals (CRA Nos. 14, 285, and 474/2026) filed by Vikash Mina against the State of Chhattisgarh. The court condoned the delay in filing CRA No. 474/2026 as the State had no objection and the cause shown was satisfactory. The State has been directed to file its objections regarding suspension of sentence and bail applications within two weeks and provide details of the appellants' criminal antecedents. The matter is listed for further hearing on the bail and suspension applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case