DR. BHUWAN SINGH NAYAK vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/13877/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010528512025

Filing Number

WPS/32371/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

WPS/13877/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. BHUWAN SINGH NAYAK

    Adv. T.K.TIWARI,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY, ,TANMOY CHOUDHURY,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Under Secretary

  3. 3.Deputy Secretary

  4. 4.Director

  5. 5.Deputy Director

  6. 6.Transfer Committee

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary of WPS/13877/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the writ petition (WPS/13877/2025) filed by Dr. Bhuwan Singh Nayak against the State of Chhattisgarh. The court granted time to the petitioner's counsel as the arguing advocate was unavailable. The case has been listed for hearing after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/13877/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPS/13877/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the writ petition (WPS/13877/2025) filed by Dr. Bhuwan Singh Nayak against the State of Chhattisgarh. The court granted time to the petitioner's counsel as the arguing advocate was unavailable. The case has been listed for hearing after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case