MOHAMMED MUSTKIM SEKHANI @ SAHIL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/2598/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010527612025

Filing Number

CRA/20430/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRA/2598/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT ( 1429 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED MUSTKIM SEKHANI @ SAHIL

    Adv. Samir Singh,ARVIND PRASAD,ARVIND PRASAD, ,ASHWELL FRANKLIN,ARVIND PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted two criminal appeals (CRA No. 2598 of 2025 and CRA No. 335 of 2026) filed by Mohammed Mustkim Sekhani and condoned the 50-day delay in filing the second appeal. The Court directed the State to file its reply to the bail and sentence suspension applications within two weeks and adjourned the matter for consideration of these interim applications after receiving the State's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/2598/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted two criminal appeals (CRA No. 2598 of 2025 and CRA No. 335 of 2026) filed by Mohammed Mustkim Sekhani and condoned the 50-day delay in filing the second appeal. The Court directed the State to file its reply to the bail and sentence suspension applications within two weeks and adjourned the matter for consideration of these interim applications after receiving the State's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case