SATYAM CHOUDHARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/13846/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010526482025

Filing Number

WPS/32269/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

WPS/13846/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYAM CHOUDHARI

    Adv. Shobhit Mishra,SURAJ PATEL,SURAJ PATEL, ,Vikas Shrivastava,SURAJ PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Director General of Police

  3. 3.The Commandant

  4. 4.The Company Commander

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Satyam Choudhari against the State of Chhattisgarh and police officials on the ground that it had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the relief sought was no longer viable and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/13846/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Satyam Choudhari against the State of Chhattisgarh and police officials on the ground that it had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the relief sought was no longer viable and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case