SHAILENDRA GYANCHANDANI vs SMT. SHARAN KAUR CHHABRA — WPC/6580/2025
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010526432025
Filing Number
WPC/32264/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
WPC/6580/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
RENT ACT MATTERS ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ARREARS OF RENT. ( 207 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAILENDRA GYANCHANDANI
Adv. Shobhit Mishra,Prasoon Agrawal,Prasoon Agrawal, ,MANEE RAM YADAV,Shishir Bhandarkar,Shishir Bhandarkar,Shishir Bhandarkar,Shishir Bhandarkar,SURAJ PATEL,Prasoon Agrawal
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. SHARAN KAUR CHHABRA
Adv. SANCHITA SINGH 1123
-
2.Vinay Chhabra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/6580/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition challenging an eviction order against tenant Shailendra Gyanchandani. The court upheld findings that a valid landlord-tenant relationship existed (supported by notarized rent agreements since 2012, bank statements showing regular rent transfers, and the petitioner's own FIR admission), and that the petitioner unlawfully sub-letted premises to Priyanka Gyanchandani without landlord consent—grounds sufficient for eviction under the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011. The court rejected petitioner's claims of a verbal sale agreement and excessive renovation expenses as unsubstantiated and inconsistent with his contradictory plea of adverse possession in a separate civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/6580/2025
Case Summary: WPC/6580/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition challenging an eviction order against tenant Shailendra Gyanchandani. The court upheld findings that a valid landlord-tenant relationship existed (supported by notarized rent agreements since 2012, bank statements showing regular rent transfers, and the petitioner's own FIR admission), and that the petitioner unlawfully sub-letted premises to Priyanka Gyanchandani without landlord consent—grounds sufficient for eviction under the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011. The court rejected petitioner's claims of a verbal sale agreement and excessive renovation expenses as unsubstantiated and inconsistent with his contradictory plea of adverse possession in a separate civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts