RAJDHAN YADAV vs SMT. REENA MAURYA Advocate - Nishi Kant Sinha, ,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA — WP227/80/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010523062025
Filing Number
WP227/32074/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
WP227/80/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJDHAN YADAV
Adv. BHUPENDRA SINGH,DHANESHWAR YADAV,DHANESHWAR YADAV, ,Tanuj Patwardhan,DHANESHWAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. REENA MAURYA Advocate - Nishi Kant Sinha, ,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA
-
2.Pankaj Singh
-
3.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
-
4.Aabha Singh
Adv. RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK DIVYANAND PATEL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The case WP227 No. 80 of 2026 (Rajdhan Yadav vs. Smt. Reena Maurya) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh has been adjourned for two weeks to allow the respondent's counsel to file a reply. The court has also consolidated this petition with another related case (WP227 No. 840 of 2025) for joint hearing. The interim relief previously granted to the petitioner continues until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP227/80/2026
Summary: The case WP227 No. 80 of 2026 (Rajdhan Yadav vs. Smt. Reena Maurya) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh has been adjourned for two weeks to allow the respondent's counsel to file a reply. The court has also consolidated this petition with another related case (WP227 No. 840 of 2025) for joint hearing. The interim relief previously granted to the petitioner continues until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts