SUKHRAM vs HIRALAL Advocate - Sangeeta Soni — WP227/1295/2025
Disposed: Contested--INFRUCTUOUS on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010511612025
Filing Number
WP227/31471/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
WP227/1295/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--INFRUCTUOUS
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKHRAM
Adv. D.N.PRAJAPATI,ADITI TRIPATHI,ADITI TRIPATHI, ,Bishnu Muni,Krishnakant Prajapati,Krishnakant Prajapati
-
2.Sijho
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIRALAL Advocate - Sangeeta Soni
-
2.Ramlakhan
-
3.Dashwa
-
4.Surendra
-
5.General Manager,
Adv. PRAKASH TIWARI
-
6.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
-
7.Luti
-
8.Pintu
Adv. VINOD KUMAR DEWANGAN,Sangeeta Soni
-
9.Ramvriksh
-
10.Lalita
-
11.Anita
-
12.Rani
-
13.Rajkumar
-
14.Sarita
-
15.Uja
-
16.Salti
-
17.Rajpati
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WP227/1295/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on 08/05/2026. The petitioners (Sukhram and Sijho) had challenged proceedings involving multiple respondents including Hiralal, Ramlakhan, Dashwa, and others. Since the underlying trial before the lower court had concluded by the time of hearing, the court found no remaining matter for adjudication and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP227/1295/2025
Case Summary: WP227/1295/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on 08/05/2026. The petitioners (Sukhram and Sijho) had challenged proceedings involving multiple respondents including Hiralal, Ramlakhan, Dashwa, and others. Since the underlying trial before the lower court had concluded by the time of hearing, the court found no remaining matter for adjudication and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts