SMT. SUBHADRA BAI SAHU vs CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR — WPL/239/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010493322025

Filing Number

WPL/30395/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

WPL/239/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LABOUR MATTERS ( 1 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 112 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SUBHADRA BAI SAHU

    Adv. YASH VERMA,APURVA VERMA,APURVA VERMA, ,Tanuj Patwardhan,VINAY KUMAR VERMA,AMAN ANSARI,AYUSH VERMA,AYUSH VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    In WPL No. 239 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case of Smt. Subhadra Bai Sahu versus Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. was adjourned. The matter was called for hearing on 01/04/2026 with the petitioner's counsel present, while the respondent remained absent. The court ordered the case to be called again after four weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 25-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  6. 25-Nov-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPL/239/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In WPL No. 239 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case of Smt. Subhadra Bai Sahu versus Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. was adjourned. The matter was called for hearing on 01/04/2026 with the petitioner's counsel present, while the respondent remained absent. The court ordered the case to be called again after four weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case