ANIL KUMAR KUSHWAHA vs YUSUF KHAN Advocate - RAJENDRA KUMAR PATEL, ,SHASHI KUMAR KUSHWAHA — CRMP/3497/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010481282025

Filing Number

CRMP/18426/2025

Filing Date

07-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRMP/3497/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR KUSHWAHA

    Adv. Tarendra Kumar Jha,UTTAM CHAND,UTTAM CHAND, ,Bhaskar Jha,Narayan Prasad Thakur,TAPAN KUMAR CHANDRA,DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA,DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA,UTTAM CHAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YUSUF KHAN Advocate - RAJENDRA KUMAR PATEL, ,SHASHI KUMAR KUSHWAHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a 30-day extension to petitioner Anil Kumar Kushwaha to file an appeal against a 2022 acquittal order, as he had failed to meet the original 60-day deadline imposed in a prior court order. The respondent did not oppose the extension request, and the court found the circumstances warranted additional time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/3497/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a 30-day extension to petitioner Anil Kumar Kushwaha to file an appeal against a 2022 acquittal order, as he had failed to meet the original 60-day deadline imposed in a prior court order. The respondent did not oppose the extension request, and the court found the circumstances warranted additional time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case