BHOJRAM @ BHOJU SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/2397/2025

Status: Motion Hearing Matters. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Hearing Matters Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010478502025

Filing Number

CRA/18298/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRA/2397/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT ( 1429 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHOJRAM @ BHOJU SAHU

    Adv. Shriya Jaiswal,ANUBHUTI MARHAS,ANUBHUTI MARHAS, ,SAMRATH SINGH MARHAS,VENKETESH PANDEY,ANUBHUTI MARHAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Adjourned. In CRA No. 2397 of 2025 (Bhojram @ Bhoju Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh), the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur adjourned the matter for two weeks on 23/03/2026. The State Counsel was directed to ensure proper service of notice upon the victim's father (PW-3), as the notice issued on 16.02.2026 had not yet been served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/2397/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. In CRA No. 2397 of 2025 (Bhojram @ Bhoju Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh), the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur adjourned the matter for two weeks on 23/03/2026. The State Counsel was directed to ensure proper service of notice upon the victim's father (PW-3), as the notice issued on 16.02.2026 had not yet been served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case