ANNAPURNA DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/13104/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010474202025

Filing Number

WPS/29297/2025

Filing Date

04-Nov-2025

Registration No

WPS/13104/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANNAPURNA DEWANGAN

    Adv. ANSHUMAN SHRIVASTAVA,RAMESHWARI KUMARI,RAMESHWARI KUMARI, ,RAMESHWARI KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Secretary

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Commissioner Cum Director

  5. 5.District Education Officer

  6. 6.Chief Executive Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary of WPS/13104/2025 Annapurna Dewangan, a Physics lecturer, challenged the State of Chhattisgarh's failure to grant her Kramonnati Vetanman (incremental pay benefit) despite completing 10 years of service as per 2017 circular. However, the petitioner sought withdrawal citing personal reasons, and the parties reached an amicable settlement. The National Lok Adalat accepted the compromise as just and proper, disposing the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  4. 20-Nov-2025

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/13104/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPS/13104/2025 Annapurna Dewangan, a Physics lecturer, challenged the State of Chhattisgarh's failure to grant her Kramonnati Vetanman (incremental pay benefit) despite completing 10 years of service as per 2017 circular. However, the petitioner sought withdrawal citing personal reasons, and the parties reached an amicable settlement. The National Lok Adalat accepted the compromise as just and proper, disposing the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case