SMT. UMANANDINI JAISWAL vs NAROTTAM KUMAR — SA/659/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010473922025

Filing Number

SA/29276/2025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2025

Registration No

SA/659/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. UMANANDINI JAISWAL

    Adv. NEERAJ CHOUBEY,AVINASH K.MISHRA,AVINASH K.MISHRA, ,SAMEER RIGRI,AVINASH K.MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAROTTAM KUMAR

  2. 2.Firteen Bai

  3. 3.Tirthinbai

  4. 4.Teejamatbai

  5. 5.Mongrabai

  6. 6.Kunti Bai

  7. 7.JyotiBai

  8. 8.Kumari Jagriti

  9. 9.Mantora Bai

  10. 10.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: In SA No. 659 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh (Smt. Umanandini Jaiswal v. Narottam Kumar & Ors.), the court granted the appellant seven days to cure procedural defaults and subsequently issued notice to respondents on an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, directing payment of process fee within 10 days. The case has been adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes] ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  6. 21-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/659/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In SA No. 659 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh (Smt. Umanandini Jaiswal v. Narottam Kumar & Ors.), the court granted the appellant seven days to cure procedural defaults and subsequently issued notice to respondents on an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, directing payment of process fee within 10 days. The case has been adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case