STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs SANJAY KUMAR YADAV — CRA/2408/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010470972025

Filing Number

CRA/17974/2025

Filing Date

01-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRA/2408/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

ADHINIYAM, 1990.MATTERS RELATING TO SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989;UNTOUCHABILITY (OFFENCES) AMENDMENT & MISC. PROVISION ACT, 1976. ( 1419 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KUMAR YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the State's criminal appeal and its application for condonation of a 108-day delay in filing. The court held that "departmental procedures" cannot justify prolonged delays, emphasizing that the State is not entitled to preferential treatment in limitation matters and must maintain administrative diligence to uphold judicial sanctity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

  6. 01-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/2408/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the State's criminal appeal and its application for condonation of a 108-day delay in filing. The court held that "departmental procedures" cannot justify prolonged delays, emphasizing that the State is not entitled to preferential treatment in limitation matters and must maintain administrative diligence to uphold judicial sanctity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case