MITHLESH KUMAR vs SOUTH EASTERN COAL FILELDS LTD. Advocate - VAIBHAV SHUKLA — WPS/13326/2025

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010466542025

Filing Number

WPS/28871/2025

Filing Date

29-Oct-2025

Registration No

WPS/13326/2025

Registration Date

22-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHLESH KUMAR

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SHUKLA,TANUSHA PATHAK,TANUSHA PATHAK, ,GUNJAN SHUKLA,GUNJAN SHUKLA,TANUSHA PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOUTH EASTERN COAL FILELDS LTD. Advocate - VAIBHAV SHUKLA

  2. 2.The Director Personnel

  3. 3.The General Manager

  4. 4.The Sub Area Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petitioner Mithlesh Kumar's writ petition to be withdrawn with liberty to file a representation before the General Manager (SECL). The court directed the respondent authority to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within 3 months of receipt, with the respondents raising no objection to this arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  6. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/13326/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petitioner Mithlesh Kumar's writ petition to be withdrawn with liberty to file a representation before the General Manager (SECL). The court directed the respondent authority to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within 3 months of receipt, with the respondents raising no objection to this arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case