SATISH DUBEY vs DEVI PRASAD / TAPESHWAR — CONT/1809/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010462442025

Filing Number

CONT/28639/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

CONT/1809/2025

Registration Date

29-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH DUBEY

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SHUKLA,GUNJAN SHUKLA,GUNJAN SHUKLA, ,KAUSHAL YADAV,KAUSHAL YADAV,TANUSHA PATHAK,GUNJAN SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVI PRASAD / TAPESHWAR

  2. 2.Chandradev Ram,

  3. 3.Viveka Dubey,

  4. 4.Ashish Dubey

  5. 5.Shivam Dubey,

  6. 6.Pooja,

  7. 7.Sudha Dubey,

  8. 8.Virendranath

  9. 9.Mr. Sanjay Rathor,

  10. 10.Mrs. Sharda Rathor,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: In Contempt Petition No. 1809 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the court allowed the petitioner's application (IA No. 2 of 2026) for amendment to correct a typographical error in the description of Respondent No. 9. The petitioner was directed to file the amended contempt petition within one week, and notice is to be issued to respondents with a four-week returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONT/1809/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Contempt Petition No. 1809 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the court allowed the petitioner's application (IA No. 2 of 2026) for amendment to correct a typographical error in the description of Respondent No. 9. The petitioner was directed to file the amended contempt petition within one week, and notice is to be issued to respondents with a four-week returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case