DINESH KUMAR YADAV vs SMT RUPA YADAV Advocate - Prasoon Agrawal, ,Aditi Singhvi,Aditi Singhvi — MAC/2470/2024
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010453482024
Filing Number
MAC/26142/2024
Filing Date
20-Dec-2024
Registration No
MAC/2470/2024
Registration Date
24-Dec-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
DRIVER / OWNERS LIABILITY MATTERS. ( 1203 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINESH KUMAR YADAV
Adv. Shalvik Tiwari,Ashwin Panickar,Ashwin Panickar, ,Ashwin Panickar
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT RUPA YADAV Advocate - Prasoon Agrawal, ,Aditi Singhvi,Aditi Singhvi
-
2.Ku Deepti Yadav
-
3.Manjusha Yadaav
-
4.Chief Executive Officer
Adv. PANKAJ AGRAWAL,SMT. A. SANDHYA RAO
-
5.Satish Verma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
Case Summary: MAC/2470/2024 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award and remitted the case for reconsideration. The court found that the tribunal failed to properly establish the vehicle owner's identity and excluded admissible evidence (salary certificates) on procedural grounds, necessitating a fresh determination of compensation with all relevant evidence considered and proper opportunity given to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
12-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
07-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
07-Jan-2025
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
-
20-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/2470/2024
Case Summary: MAC/2470/2024 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award and remitted the case for reconsideration. The court found that the tribunal failed to properly establish the vehicle owner's identity and excluded admissible evidence (salary certificates) on procedural grounds, necessitating a fresh determination of compensation with all relevant evidence considered and proper opportunity given to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts