SAVITRI SINGHANIA vs GIRDHAR Advocate - RAJKUMAR PALI, ,Amit Kumar Sahu,Amit Kumar Sahu — CR/5/2020

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010444972019

Filing Number

CR/26679/2019

Filing Date

19-Dec-2019

Registration No

CR/5/2020

Registration Date

10-Jan-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE C.P.C. ( 1722 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVITRI SINGHANIA

    Adv. MANOJ PARANJPE,ANSHUL TIWARI,ANSHUL TIWARI, ,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,Anurag Singh,Prasoon Agrawal,Bharat Sharma,Rashul bhawnani,VAISHALI MAHILONG,ANSHUL TIWARI

  2. 2.Kapiraj Singhania

  3. 3.Birendra Singhania

  4. 4.Giriraj Singhania

  5. 5.Raghvendra Singhania

  6. 6.Madhu Agrawal

  7. 7.Manju Khedia (Wrongly Typed in Applicant as Madhu Khedia)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIRDHAR Advocate - RAJKUMAR PALI, ,Amit Kumar Sahu,Amit Kumar Sahu

  2. 2.Anandram

  3. 3.Sevaram

  4. 4.Leelaram (Died) Through Lrs(Legal Heir)4.

  5. 5.(A) Hemin Bai

  6. 6.Ravatmal Jain

  7. 7.Pukhraj Jain

  8. 8.Gangadas

  9. 9.Fekani Bai

  10. 10.Khushi Bai

  11. 11.Kewra

  12. 12.Bhuri

  13. 13.Kamla (Wrongly Typed Rumla)

  14. 14.State of Chhattisgarh.

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary: In CR No. 5 of 2020 (Savitri Singhania vs. Girdhar) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the court granted two weeks' time to the applicants to remove the default pointed out by the office. The revision petition will stand dismissed without reference to the bench if the default is not corrected within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 25-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  5. 23-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  6. 15-Mar-2023

    For Orders [On Office Notes] ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  7. 15-Mar-2023

    For Orders [On Office Notes] ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  8. 15-Mar-2023

    For Orders [On Office Notes] ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  9. 28-Feb-2023

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel

  10. 09-Feb-2023

    Motion Hearing Matters ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  11. 31-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF

  12. 15-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  13. 11-Nov-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  14. 20-Oct-2022

    Motion Hearing Matters ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

  15. 22-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  16. 05-Apr-2022

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel

  17. 22-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF

  18. 24-Sep-2020

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  19. 20-Aug-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  20. 18-Aug-2020

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  21. 21-Jul-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  22. 25-Mar-2020

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  23. 04-Mar-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  24. 16-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  25. 16-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 19-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/5/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In CR No. 5 of 2020 (Savitri Singhania vs. Girdhar) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the court granted two weeks' time to the applicants to remove the default pointed out by the office. The revision petition will stand dismissed without reference to the bench if the default is not corrected within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case