CHAITRAM BAGHEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/82/2020

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010431852019

Filing Number

WPS/25848/2019

Filing Date

10-Dec-2019

Registration No

WPS/82/2020

Registration Date

06-Jan-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. ( 606 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAITRAM BAGHEL

    Adv. VARUN SHARMA,Faiz Kazi,Faiz Kazi, ,Neha Shukla,AMAN KESHARWANI,Faiz Kazi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Commandant

  3. 3.Assistant Commandant and Enquiry Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPS No. 82 of 2020 filed by Chaitram Baghel, a Platoon Commander in CAF, as the petition had become infructuous. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the matter no longer required judicial intervention and accordingly disposed of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 04-Mar-2020

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

  5. 29-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  6. 29-Jan-2020

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

  7. 08-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  8. 08-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/82/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPS No. 82 of 2020 filed by Chaitram Baghel, a Platoon Commander in CAF, as the petition had become infructuous. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the matter no longer required judicial intervention and accordingly disposed of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case