HEMLAL TANDAN vs PUNITRAM DHINVAR — MAC/2249/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010423862025

Filing Number

MAC/26373/2025

Filing Date

24-Sep-2025

Registration No

MAC/2249/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMLAL TANDAN

    Adv. RAKESH KUMAR THAKUR,Anway Tiwari,Anway Tiwari, ,SHASHI BHUSAN TIWARI,SATYENDRA SRIVAS,Anway Tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNITRAM DHINVAR

  2. 2.Sharad Pandey

    Adv. KRISHNA TANDON

  3. 3.Chola Mandolam M.S. General Insurance Company Ltd.

    Adv. SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,Sharad Mishra PRIYA KAIWART PRASHANT SAHU KAUSTUBH SINGH THAKUR SHARDA KASHYAP GUDIA BAGGA SUDHANSHU UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the appeal filed by Hemlal Tandan against Punitram Dhinvar and others. The court granted condonation of a 186-day delay in filing the appeal, finding the reasons satisfactory under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The case has been listed for final hearing along with MAC No. 2168/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 17-Oct-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

  5. 24-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/2249/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the appeal filed by Hemlal Tandan against Punitram Dhinvar and others. The court granted condonation of a 186-day delay in filing the appeal, finding the reasons satisfactory under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The case has been listed for final hearing along with MAC No. 2168/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case