GANESH RAM CHANDRAKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/8101/2025

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th November 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010421232025

Filing Number

MCRC/15902/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

MCRC/8101/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

17-Nov-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANESH RAM CHANDRAKAR

    Adv. SHUBHANK TIWARI,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP, ,ADITYA CHOPRA,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Ganesh Ram Chandrakar, a mathematics teacher accused of sexually inappropriate conduct against a student under Sections 74 of BNS and Section 10 of POCSO Act, 2012. The court found that three key prosecution witnesses (PW-4, 5 & 8) did not support the case, the applicant had been imprisoned since January 9, 2025, and the trial would take considerable time. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with conditions including regular court appearance, no witness tampering, and no contact with the victim or her family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  4. 13-Oct-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

  5. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/8101/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Ganesh Ram Chandrakar, a mathematics teacher accused of sexually inappropriate conduct against a student under Sections 74 of BNS and Section 10 of POCSO Act, 2012. The court found that three key prosecution witnesses (PW-4, 5 & 8) did not support the case, the applicant had been imprisoned since January 9, 2025, and the trial would take considerable time. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with conditions including regular court appearance, no witness tampering, and no contact with the victim or her family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case