BED SINGH vs SMT. PANCHMATI — SA/538/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010419632025

Filing Number

SA/26138/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

SA/538/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BED SINGH

    Adv. G. L. Uike,ANIL VAISHNAV,ANIL VAISHNAV, ,GANESH PRASAD PRAJAPATI,GANESH PRASAD PRAJAPATI

  2. 2.Umend Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PANCHMATI

  2. 2.Nanhu Khunte

  3. 3.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Second Appeal No. 538 of 2025 (Bed Singh v. Smt. Panchmati) for hearing on the substantial question of law regarding whether the dismissal of a first appeal under Section 96 CPC on limitation grounds was justified when the condonation application was rejected without considering sufficiency of cause. Notice has been issued to respondents upon payment of process fee, with the case listed for further hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  4. 08-Oct-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

  5. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/538/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Second Appeal No. 538 of 2025 (Bed Singh v. Smt. Panchmati) for hearing on the substantial question of law regarding whether the dismissal of a first appeal under Section 96 CPC on limitation grounds was justified when the condonation application was rejected without considering sufficiency of cause. Notice has been issued to respondents upon payment of process fee, with the case listed for further hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case