SUMIT KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/9074/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010415142022

Filing Number

WPS/23021/2022

Filing Date

13-Dec-2022

Registration No

WPS/9074/2022

Registration Date

14-Dec-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMIT KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. SUSHOBHIT SINGH,CHANDRA KUMAR,CHANDRA KUMAR, ,CHANDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Chief Executive Officer

  4. 4.Chief Executive Officer

    Adv. AMRITO DAS

  5. 5.Chief Executive Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Sumit Kumar Yadav's petition challenging his transfer from Janpad Panchayat Berla to Janpad Panchayat Bemetara. The court held that the impugned order constituted an "attachment" rather than a "transfer," therefore Rule 27 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Rules 1999 did not apply. The court found that the Chief Executive Officer, as the appointing authority, has inherent power to attach an employee's services for administrative purposes without affecting seniority or service conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 19-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 15-Dec-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  6. 13-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/9074/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Sumit Kumar Yadav's petition challenging his transfer from Janpad Panchayat Berla to Janpad Panchayat Bemetara. The court held that the impugned order constituted an "attachment" rather than a "transfer," therefore Rule 27 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Rules 1999 did not apply. The court found that the Chief Executive Officer, as the appointing authority, has inherent power to attach an employee's services for administrative purposes without affecting seniority or service conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case