DR. SUSHMA PARIHAR vs DR. DHARMENDRA KUMAR PARIHAR Advocate - Ravipal Maheshwari, ,Bharat Lal Sahu,Neha Khandekar,PURNCHAND — FA(MAT)/348/2023

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010413152023

Filing Number

FA(MAT)/23741/2023

Filing Date

19-Dec-2023

Registration No

FA(MAT)/348/2023

Registration Date

21-Dec-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

FAMILY LAW MATTERS ( 15 )

Sub-Category

ADOPTION & MAINTENANCE MATTERS. ( 1505 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. SUSHMA PARIHAR

    Adv. VIJAY K.DESHMUKH,KOMAL YADAV,KOMAL YADAV, ,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,LALITA PATEL,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,DEVERSHI THAKUR,SATYAWATI UKEY,PAWAN KUMAR SAHU,PAWAN KUMAR SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DR. DHARMENDRA KUMAR PARIHAR Advocate - Ravipal Maheshwari, ,Bharat Lal Sahu,Neha Khandekar,PURNCHAND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh partly allowed Dr. Sushma Parihar's appeal against the Family Court's divorce decree, holding that while the Family Court correctly granted divorce to the husband under Section 13(1-क) of the Hindu Marriage Act, it erred in declining to decide the wife's permanent alimony application under Section 25 on merit. The court set aside the portion dismissing the alimony claim and remanded the case to the Family Court to decide the permanent alimony application expeditiously, citing the Supreme Court's decision in *Rajnesh v. Neha*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 04-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 13-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  6. 17-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  7. 17-Oct-2024

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  8. 26-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  9. 08-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  10. 03-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 19-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA(MAT)/348/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh partly allowed Dr. Sushma Parihar's appeal against the Family Court's divorce decree, holding that while the Family Court correctly granted divorce to the husband under Section 13(1-क) of the Hindu Marriage Act, it erred in declining to decide the wife's permanent alimony application under Section 25 on merit. The court set aside the portion dismissing the alimony claim and remanded the case to the Family Court to decide the permanent alimony application expeditiously, citing the Supreme Court's decision in *Rajnesh v. Neha*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case