SMT. NEETU SINGH vs SMT. MAHAMAYA GUPTA Advocate - ASHOK KUMAR SHUKLA, ,RAVI SINGH,GUNJAN SHUKLA,GUNJAN SHUKLA — FA/191/2025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010405282025
Filing Number
FA/25233/2025
Filing Date
12-Sep-2025
Registration No
FA/191/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. NEETU SINGH
Adv. Pushkar Sinha,Abhishek Choubey,Abhishek Choubey, ,PAWAN SHRIVASTAVA,Abhishek Choubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. MAHAMAYA GUPTA Advocate - ASHOK KUMAR SHUKLA, ,RAVI SINGH,GUNJAN SHUKLA,GUNJAN SHUKLA
-
2.Aman Gupta
-
3.Archana Gupta
-
4.Shashima Gupta
-
5.Sanjay Agrawal
-
6.Smt. Vandana Gupta
-
7.Gyaneshwar Prasad Gupta
-
8.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the condonation application (I.A. No.01/2025) and condoned a 93-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the appellant's medical reasons despite lack of documentary evidence. The appeal was admitted, and notices were issued to respondents 3-7. As an interim measure, partition proceedings are permitted to continue but no final order may be passed without court's prior permission until the next hearing scheduled five weeks later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
-
12-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. FA/191/2025
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the condonation application (I.A. No.01/2025) and condoned a 93-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the appellant's medical reasons despite lack of documentary evidence. The appeal was admitted, and notices were issued to respondents 3-7. As an interim measure, partition proceedings are permitted to continue but no final order may be passed without court's prior permission until the next hearing scheduled five weeks later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts