VIMLA BAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/7544/2024
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010403762024
Filing Number
WPS/23232/2024
Filing Date
18-Nov-2024
Registration No
WPS/7544/2024
Registration Date
20-Nov-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIMLA BAI
Adv. JITENDRA GUPTA,prakash kumar goswami,prakash kumar goswami, ,prakash kumar goswami
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director,
-
3.Deputy Director, Pension,
-
4.Commissioner,
Adv. PANKAJ AGRAWAL,DHIRAJ KUMAR WANKHEDE SAMYAK SINGHALI SHREYA DAGA ANIRUDDH SINGH ABHILEY SHRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WPS 7544/2024 - Vimla Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh A 72-year-old retired safai kamgar (sanitation worker) from Municipal Corporation Durg filed a writ petition challenging pension and gratuity arrears. The Chhattisgarh High Court's Lok Adalat found that the State had paid Rs. 1,55,921/- towards the arrears, fully redressing the petitioner's grievance. The petition was disposed of, with the petitioner retaining liberty to pursue further remedies if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
22-Nov-2024
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
-
18-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/7544/2024
Case Summary: WPS 7544/2024 - Vimla Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh A 72-year-old retired safai kamgar (sanitation worker) from Municipal Corporation Durg filed a writ petition challenging pension and gratuity arrears. The Chhattisgarh High Court's Lok Adalat found that the State had paid Rs. 1,55,921/- towards the arrears, fully redressing the petitioner's grievance. The petition was disposed of, with the petitioner retaining liberty to pursue further remedies if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts