SUKHDEV KAROSIYA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/7661/2024
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010403452024
Filing Number
WPS/23201/2024
Filing Date
18-Nov-2024
Registration No
WPS/7661/2024
Registration Date
23-Nov-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKHDEV KAROSIYA
Adv. JITENDRA GUPTA,prakash kumar goswami,prakash kumar goswami, ,prakash kumar goswami
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director
Adv. DHIRAJ KUMAR WANKHEDE,SHREYA PAWAN DAGA SAMYAK SINGHAL AISHLEY SHRIVASTAVA ANIRUDDH SINGH SHAHIL SINGH
-
3.Deputy Director
-
4.Commissioner
Adv. PANKAJ AGRAWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: In WPS 7661/2024, retired safai kamgar Sukhdev Karosiya sought relief regarding pension and gratuity arrears from Chhattisgarh authorities. The National Lok Adalat found that Rs. 3,18,516/- had been paid to the petitioner as arrears of pension and gratuity, resolving his grievance. The petition was disposed of on May 9, 2026, with the petitioner withdrawing further claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
27-Nov-2024
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
-
18-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/7661/2024
Case Summary: In WPS 7661/2024, retired safai kamgar Sukhdev Karosiya sought relief regarding pension and gratuity arrears from Chhattisgarh authorities. The National Lok Adalat found that Rs. 3,18,516/- had been paid to the petitioner as arrears of pension and gratuity, resolving his grievance. The petition was disposed of on May 9, 2026, with the petitioner withdrawing further claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts