JAISHRI SONI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/8750/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010399942022

Filing Number

WPS/22099/2022

Filing Date

01-Dec-2022

Registration No

WPS/8750/2022

Registration Date

03-Dec-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REGULARIZATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 602 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAISHRI SONI

    Adv. KISHORE NARAYAN,AMARNATH PANDEY,AMARNATH PANDEY, ,RAJNI SOREN,Pritam Singh,DIWESH KUMAR,Deepali Gupta,AMARNATH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Joint Director

  4. 4.Principal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Jaishri Soni's petition seeking regularization as a Training Officer (COPA Trade) after 19 years of service as Guest Faculty. The court held that since Soni was not engaged against a sanctioned vacant post through advertisement or interview, and her claim fell outside the state's 2008 regularization circular, she was not entitled to regularization. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent striking down similar ad hoc regularization policies lacking transparency and justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 09-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 06-Dec-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  6. 01-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/8750/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Jaishri Soni's petition seeking regularization as a Training Officer (COPA Trade) after 19 years of service as Guest Faculty. The court held that since Soni was not engaged against a sanctioned vacant post through advertisement or interview, and her claim fell outside the state's 2008 regularization circular, she was not entitled to regularization. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent striking down similar ad hoc regularization policies lacking transparency and justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case