SEWA RAM vs MANISH KUMAR — CRMP/2913/2025
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010397442025
Filing Number
CRMP/14966/2025
Filing Date
09-Sep-2025
Registration No
CRMP/2913/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SEWA RAM
Adv. Tarendra Kumar Jha,UTTAM CHAND,UTTAM CHAND, ,Bhaskar Jha,Narayan Prasad Thakur,TAPAN KUMAR CHANDRA,DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA,DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA,UTTAM CHAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANISH KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh recalled its previous order dated 13.08.2025 that had permitted the petitioner Sewa Ram to file an appeal against an acquittal, finding such an appeal would not be maintainable under law. The court recognized that its earlier directive was based on a bona fide mistake and was contrary to established legal procedure, as an appeal had already been filed and decided by the Additional Sessions Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
17-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/2913/2025
The High Court of Chhattisgarh recalled its previous order dated 13.08.2025 that had permitted the petitioner Sewa Ram to file an appeal against an acquittal, finding such an appeal would not be maintainable under law. The court recognized that its earlier directive was based on a bona fide mistake and was contrary to established legal procedure, as an appeal had already been filed and decided by the Additional Sessions Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts