CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. vs SANTOSHI YADAV Advocate - ADITYA KHARE, ,PARAS MANI SHRIWAS,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas,PARAS MANI SHRIWAS,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas — ACQA/479/2018

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010393102018

Filing Number

ACQA/18911/2018

Filing Date

05-Dec-2018

Registration No

ACQA/479/2018

Registration Date

06-Dec-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. ABHISHEK SINHA,Amit Buxy,Amit Buxy, ,GHANSHYAM PATEL,GHANSHYAM PATEL,D.L.DEWANGAN,S. Harshita,Amit Buxy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSHI YADAV Advocate - ADITYA KHARE, ,PARAS MANI SHRIWAS,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas,PARAS MANI SHRIWAS,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Case Adjourned In ACQA No. 479 of 2018 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Santoshi Yadav), the case was adjourned on 25/03/2026 due to absence of counsel for both parties. The matter is scheduled for final hearing after 3 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  4. 01-Dec-2025

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  5. 05-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/479/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned In ACQA No. 479 of 2018 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Santoshi Yadav), the case was adjourned on 25/03/2026 due to absence of counsel for both parties. The matter is scheduled for final hearing after 3 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case