JENNY ROZARIO @ LEWIS vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,A.G. — WPS/8956/2022

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010388062022

Filing Number

WPS/21367/2022

Filing Date

23-Nov-2022

Registration No

WPS/8956/2022

Registration Date

09-Dec-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REGULARIZATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 602 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JENNY ROZARIO @ LEWIS

    Adv. Krishnaraj Mishra,SURENDRA KUMAR DEWANGAN,SURENDRA KUMAR DEWANGAN, ,DR. SURENDRA KUMAR DEWANGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Secretary

  4. 4.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

  5. 5.Director

  6. 6.District Education Officer

  7. 7.Commanding Officer

  8. 8.Managing Committee

  9. 9.Principal

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Case Summary: In WPS 8956/2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur adjourned the matter on 12.05.2026. The court granted two weeks' time to respondents No. 1-3 & 7 to file their reply, issued notice to respondents No. 8 & 9 via ordinary and speed post, and scheduled the case for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 23-Feb-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 17-Feb-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  6. 15-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  7. 13-Dec-2022

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  8. 23-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/8956/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPS 8956/2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur adjourned the matter on 12.05.2026. The court granted two weeks' time to respondents No. 1-3 & 7 to file their reply, issued notice to respondents No. 8 & 9 via ordinary and speed post, and scheduled the case for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case