SUMAN KISHORE KINDO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Advocate - A.G. — WPS/7392/2024
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010380282024
Filing Number
WPS/21862/2024
Filing Date
25-Oct-2024
Registration No
WPS/7392/2024
Registration Date
13-Nov-2024
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
ULTRA VIRES MATTERS ( 1749 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMAN KISHORE KINDO
Adv. MATEEN SIDDIQUI,DANISH A. SIDDIQUI,DANISH A. SIDDIQUI, ,SANDEEP SINGH,NARENDRA MEHAR,Ghanshyam Kashyap,waquar naiyer,DIKSHA GOURAHA,HARSHMANDER RASTOGI,VEDANT SHADANGI,ABHYUDAY TRIPATHI,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK
-
2.Dular Singh Sidar
-
3.Sandeep Kumar Banjare
-
4.Nilesh Shrivastava
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Chhattisgarh State Renewable Energy Development Agency (CREDA),
Adv. Trivikram Nayak,Shikhar Shrivastava SARVESH KHATNANI Vinay Nagdev
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: Four Sub-Engineers at CREDA challenged Clause 13.2 of the 2004 Service Rules, which prescribed Merit-cum-Seniority for promotion to Assistant Engineer, arguing it violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as infructuous on May 8, 2026, after the petitioners' counsel submitted that their grievance had already been redressed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2024
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
18-Nov-2024
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
25-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/7392/2024
Case Summary: Four Sub-Engineers at CREDA challenged Clause 13.2 of the 2004 Service Rules, which prescribed Merit-cum-Seniority for promotion to Assistant Engineer, arguing it violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as infructuous on May 8, 2026, after the petitioners' counsel submitted that their grievance had already been redressed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts