MRS. KESHAR vs SHRI RADESH YADAV Advocate - BHARAT RAJPUT, RAJESH PANDIT,D.P PANDEY — CRR/1202/2024

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010368402024

Filing Number

CRR/15719/2024

Filing Date

18-Oct-2024

Registration No

CRR/1202/2024

Registration Date

05-Nov-2024

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE U/S 144 & 146 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1402 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRS. KESHAR

    Adv. VINOD YADAV,ARUN KUMAR ROY,ARUN KUMAR ROY, ,AKASH MISHRA

  2. 2.Mas. Taksha Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI RADESH YADAV Advocate - BHARAT RAJPUT, RAJESH PANDIT,D.P PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the wife's revision petition challenging the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs. 7,000/month for her and Rs. 3,000/month for their chronically ill minor son, finding no illegality in the lower court's decision after proper consideration of evidence and both parties' circumstances. However, the court directed the Family Court to conclude the Section 125 CrPC proceedings within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 18-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 06-Nov-2024

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  6. 18-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1202/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the wife's revision petition challenging the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs. 7,000/month for her and Rs. 3,000/month for their chronically ill minor son, finding no illegality in the lower court's decision after proper consideration of evidence and both parties' circumstances. However, the court directed the Family Court to conclude the Section 125 CrPC proceedings within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case